The Pope Center defends academic freedom against Pope Center attacks on academic freedom (?!)

-
Surfing around on the Pope Center site, I came across this provocative exchange.

 There was a very interesting essay by Robert Lawson, who, in trying to defend so-called "free enterprise" centers against irresponsible forms of interference in academic work, ended up arguing against much of what the Pope Center wants to do about "leftists" on campus. (I address the conceptualization of "leftists" and "free enterprise" in another post about the Pope Center.)  

 Former UNC Faculty Assembly Chair Stephen Leonard saw the contradiction and called out this bit of Popery. I am posting Leonard's response here, with permission from the author. 
Professor Stephen Leonard  3 months ago

It is always heartening to see that the Pope Center agrees with those of us who see the debasement of University governance as a critical concern. It is even more heartening to see that the Pope Center is willing to post materials that are powerful forms of auto-critique (that's the post-modernist way of saying self-criticism. The postmodern terms strike me as more telling than the "traditional" terms).
Lawson's analysis comports perfectly with circumstances in the UNC system. Making the switch of venues is straightforward. First, simply extend the second sentence of the first paragraph to note in matters of academic freedom "sometimes the attack comes from aggressive students who can’t stand having others say things they disagree with, and sometimes it comes from administrators who don’t like it when faculty members make impolitic statements, [and sometimes it comes from legislators and governing boards who are bothered by criticisms from faculty]." Replace all references to the UnKoch My Campus group with "Pope Center" or "Civitas Institute," all UnKoch descriptions of APEE activities with Pope Center descriptions of "liberal" professors at UNC, replace Johnson Center with "UNC Poverty Center" or "Civil Rights Center," and replace the disciplinary actions of the Troy U administration with the disciplinary actions that members of the legislature and Board of Governors would like to impose on UNC faculty.
The result speaks for itself: every dimension of Lawson's criticisms apply to the attacks on academic freedom and the excessive politicization of UNC that has been promoted by the General Assembly leadership, the handful of hyperpartisans on the UNC Board of Governors, and -- sadly -- the staff and leadership of Pope Center for Higher Education Policy. But I for one welcome this fecund moment of auto-critique, which suggests that perhaps the Pope Center is moving past selective application of principles of academic freedom, to a full and uncompromised defense of those principles.

Popular posts from this blog

HOW THE LEGISLATURE ANNEXED PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION TO PARTISAN POLITICS

-
Image
Contributor "Will Davie's Ghost" analyzes what is arguably the most significant instance of politicization of public higher education in the 45 year history of the UNC system. HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE JONES STREET DOMINION As the end of the recent legislative session fades into the past, North Carolinians should know that moment also marks the establishment of a new era for public higher education in this state: lawmakers finally swept aside or transgressed nearly all the checks and balances protecting our universities from partisan political interference. These new statutory provisions are so broad in reach, and ill-conceived in substance, that members of the University community are still struggling to make sense of the implications and intent of this historically unprecedented arrogation of power. The full force of these changes will not be felt for months, and in some cases for years, but when they are citizens will wonder how one of the best systems of ...
Read more

Cecil Staton (and ECU) discover Governance Chaos Theory

-
Image
LINKS AND FURTHER EDITING FORTHCOMING. This is a first cut on this one. Inside Higher Ed (and Rick Seltzer in particular) caught up with the Executive leadership mess now unfolding in Greenville . Cecil Staton has had one foot out the door for at least 9 months. (It was very interesting watching the Board of Governors, and Staton, struggle to respond when some of the BoG radicals tried to savage Staton and ECU several months ago). Now Staton is going -- and (like Tom Ross, and probably Margaret Spellings) he has a 'non-disparagement' clause for his severance contract.  (Hell, if they had given me one of those payouts, I probably never would have considered writing these things. Then again, that would have meant nightly and nasty visits from Cato's Ghost, so I probably would have been shamed into backing out of any payout deal. Sometimes cowardice protects you from being stupid, too.) 
Read more
-
  The Right Changes for UNC Steven Bachenheimer and Stephen Leonard The UNC Strategic Planning process has always been an occasion to recommit ourselves to the ideals for which public higher education in North Carolina was established. Today, it appears to have become the occasion for implementing radical changes favored by a handful of individuals in the state legislature, on the UNC Board of Governors, and in various Washington and Raleigh think tanks. Against all evidence to the contrary, and against the long and venerable tradition that has made public higher education in North Carolina a model for the nation and the world, the changes being promoted suggest that the widely available, broadly accessible, and readily affordable system of higher education we have is an extravagance North Carolina does not need. For example, Board of Governors member Fred Eshelman, described by pundits at the Pope Center for Higher Education Policy as “leading the charge” for radical chan...
Read more